|
ARCHITECTURE &
FACILITIES
Clean and Green Get a Head of SteamCollege campuses are
embracing alternative energy, and student activism is the engine of
change
By MEGAN MELINE
In
2000 students at the University of Colorado at Boulder voted to
purchase alternative energy for three student-run buildings. Putting
their money behind their collective social consciousness, they
agreed to pay higher activity fees to cover the cost of more
expensive wind power. Like a match to gas, the action sparked a
movement.
A year later, three Pennsylvania colleges opted to
buy wind power to cover a portion of their electricity needs. One,
the University of Pennsylvania, agreed to buy 5 percent of its
electricity, or 20 million kilowatt-hours, from wind-power sources,
later doubling that commitment. The campus is now one of the largest
retail customers of wind energy in the country. Elsewhere, the State
University of New York at Buffalo in 2003 tripled its consumption of
wind-generated electricity to 6 percent of its total energy needs
last year, becoming New York State's largest consumer of wind
energy. Similarly, the University of Wisconsin at Oshkosh is its
state's biggest consumer of green power.
"There has been a
remarkable sequence of green-power purchases recently ... remarkable
because of the breadth of institutions buying green power and the
size of their purchases," says Kurt Johnson, director of the
Environmental Protection Agency's Green Power Partnership program.
In the past three years alone, at least 50 colleges have
bought wind and other forms of green power for the first time, and
many more are showing interest in alternative sources of energy,
says Paul Copleman, manager of customer services at Community Energy
Inc., a marketer of wind power based in Pennsylvania.
Thinking Green
Green power is electricity
created from clean or renewable energy sources -- such as wind,
water, and sun -- that flows into a utility's power grid along
with energy generated from fossil fuels. Consumers who buy green
power do not receive that power directly in their homes. Rather,
their purchases reduce the use of fossil fuels to make electricity
and increase the percentage of green energy on the grid.
Several factors are fueling the greening of energy
consumption on college campuses: student activism, the increasing
availability and affordability of alternative sources of energy,
financial incentives provided by energy companies and
municipalities, and the lure of long-term cost savings. As a result,
experts say, higher education has become a force in expanding the
green-power market.
"Higher education's involvement has been
very helpful," says Christine de Azua, assistant director of
communications at the American Wind Energy Association. "It's
leading by example."
Higher education has long been a pioneer
on environmental issues. The energy conservation programs at
SUNY-Buffalo started more than 20 years ago. In 1989 the National
Wildlife Federation founded its Campus Ecology program, which has
helped thousands of students to design and carry out environmental
programs at their colleges. The Association of University Leaders
for a Sustainable Future, founded in 1992, urges administrators to
promote environmental sustainability in their classrooms and
policies. More than 50 American colleges have joined the
association, including Ball State and Tufts Universities, and the
University of Michigan at Ann Arbor.
For greenies, to use
alternative fuels is to exercise a personal value, says one energy
expert. Students, professors, facilities managers, and top
administrators have come together on some campuses to strategize
about how to finance and purchase alternative energy sources. Many
say they are willing to pay more for a cleaner environment.
Green-power advocates proudly note that the evolution of higher
education's energy usage is taking place despite lean budgets and
the federal government's loosening of environmental regulations.
"It's time for higher education to take a stand," says Omar
Blaik, senior vice president for facilities and real estate services
at Penn. "Our institution is huge, and every minor change in our
behavior has a major impact on the environment."
At least
two colleges have made an unusual commitment to go 100 percent
green: Colby College, in Waterville, Maine, and Concordia University
at Austin, in Texas.
About 90 percent of Colby's electricity
comes from a combination of hydropower and biomass, nonfossil
organic materials such as vegetation, municipal solid wastes, animal
waste, and agriculture byproducts. Colby covers the rest of its
power needs by producing steam to heat buildings and spin a turbine
that makes electricity.
"At some point, you just have to
make the commitment to green power," says Patricia Crandlemire
Murphy, director of Colby's physical plant. "We are paying 9 percent
more to purchase a 100-percent- green, 100-percent-Maine power
product, and think it is worth the extra cost."
Students have
played a leading role in bringing green power to their campuses.
They "helped push us to be where we are today," says Mike Coleman,
executive director of operations at Penn.
Since the Boulder
effort, students at Connecticut College, Eastern University, and the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill have voluntarily
increased their activity fees to help finance green-power purchases.
Eastern plans to buy 37 percent of its electricity from wind-power
sources.
Liz Veazey, a senior and an environmental-science
major at UNC, started the Green Energy Campaign last fall to bring
alternative energy to Chapel Hill. "We knew the school and the state
are having real budget problems, so we knew we'd have to ask the
students," she says. "Boulder did it, so we thought it would work
here."
The campaign has raised about $184,000, to buy solar
panels. "I'd love to be able to buy wind," Ms. Veazey says. "I'm
jealous of Eastern buying 37 percent; even 5 percent would be
crazy."
Students at Chapel Hill are joining with their peers
at Duke, North Carolina State and Appalachian State Universities to
organize a renewable-energy conference to be held in April.
"We feel that the Southeast is behind in renewable energy,
and we want to get students motivated to do more on their campuses,"
says Ms. Veazey.
Students are also supporting the expansion
of green power by purchasing portfolios of "carbon dioxide offsets,"
projects such as wind farms that reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Last fall members of Lewis and Clark College's environmental club,
Students Engaged in Eco-Defense, raised $16,400 to purchase offsets.
The purchase allowed Lewis and Clark to become the first
American college to meet the strict standards of the Kyoto Protocol,
the 1997 international treaty to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The Bush administration withdrew the United States from the accord
because it believed compliance could harm the American
economy.
Lewis and Clark students living in campus residences
also can opt to buy green power by simply checking a box on an
electricity form when they move in.
But not all students are
happy about spending their money on green power.
"There is a
small but very vocal, very conservative minority who are opposed to
wind power because of the extra fee that they have to pay," says
Eugene Pearson, a junior at Boulder. "There haven't been any
protests, just general grumblings."
Some students argue that
renewable energy is unreliable. Others worry about migrating birds
flying into the large wind turbines, a problem that has largely been
corrected, Mr. Pearson says. Still others oppose fee increases of
any kind.
Conservation Efforts
To pay for more
expensive alternative fuel, some colleges and universities are
conserving energy.
Penn started an aggressive
energy-conservation program in 2001, cutting peak electricity demand
by 10,000 kilowatt-hours, or 18 percent. The savings more than cover
the extra $300,000 green power costs each year. "We've had some
pain," says Mr. Blaik. "It's a little colder in the winter and
hotter in the summer. But it's okay for someone to wear a sweater in
the winter."
Michael Dupre, associate vice president for
university facilities at SUNY-Buffalo, estimates that the
energy-conservation program there saves $9-million per year.
States, municipalities, and utility companies offer
additional financial incentives to go green. Last year Loyola
Marymount University, in Los Angeles, built a 500,000-square-foot
solar roof by cashing in on two rebates -- one for $3.6-million
from the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and another for
$325,000 from the Southern California Gas Company. The total cost of
the project was $4.3-million.
The college will soon install
solar cells on two other buildings, for a total investment of about
$600,000. The solar panels will save $100,000 a year and generate 15
percent of peak electricity needs.
Importance of Fixed
Costs
For some colleges, fixed energy costs may be an
important consideration in choosing an energy source. During the
2001 California energy crisis, Western institutions experienced
firsthand the budget problems that can occur when electricity costs
spike unexpectedly.
Concordia signed a contract with Austin
Energy's GreenChoice program last summer to meet all of its energy
needs -- about 5.5 million kilowatt-hours per year -- for
the next 10 years. The purchase price will be locked until 2011 at
2.85 cents per kilowatt-hour.
"It was a lucky gamble," says
Ron Petty, Concordia's facilities director. "The price of natural
gas has already gone up three times since we decided to do
this."
But locking in at a fixed rate also has risks. The
price of wind energy may drop during the next decade as supplies
increase. Colleges could end up losing money on the deal, says one
wind-energy expert.
At least one college is betting that it
will make money from green power. California State University's new
Channel Islands campus hopes to generate up to $2-million annually
by building the country's first anaerobic digester, a series of
enclosed tanks in which bacteria compost green waste or biomass,
such as grass clippings, to produce methane gas.
Local farms
would bring the biomass to the university and pay a fee for its
disposal. The university would convert the biomass to methane gas
and sell it to the plant that supplies the campus with electricity.
The leftover compost would then be sold to farms. The digester
should be functioning later this year.
"It's clean, and its
energy is inexpensive," says George Dutra, the university's
associate vice president for operations, planning and construction.
"I bet it will spread to other campus communities."
http://chronicle.com Section: Money & Management Volume
50, Issue 30, Page A27
|